Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status
Date
Msg-id 4A844F07.8060102@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> That was proposed and rejected quite a long time ago.  We don't *want*
> people to be able to "just change a GUC" and have their xlog go
> somewhere else, because of the foot-gun potential.  You need to be sure
> that the existing WAL files get moved over when you do something like
> that, and the GUC infrastructure isn't up to ensuring that.

Doesn't the same argument apply to data_directory?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY speedup
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status