Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Date
Msg-id 4A849ED5.8040305@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> What are you envisioning exactly?  If vacuum finds any reason to dirty
> a page (or it's already dirty), then freeze everything on the page that's
> got age > some lower threshold?

I was envisioning, if the page is already dirty and in memory *for any
reason*, the freeze rows at below some threshold.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Next
From: Stef Walter
Date:
Subject: pg_hba.conf: samehost and samenet