Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

26 September 2008

• 00:12   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 00:28   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Robert Haas
• 00:29   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Bruce Momjian
• 00:32   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Robert Haas
• 00:48   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 00:57   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 00:57   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 01:01   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 01:23   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 01:41   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Bruce Momjian
• 02:04   Bug in ILIKE? Tom Lane
• 02:09   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 02:10   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Robert Haas
• 02:20   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 02:24   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Bruce Momjian
• 02:32   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 02:41   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 02:45   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Andrew Dunstan
• 02:54   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 02:59   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Robert Haas
• 03:17   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 03:34   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Robert Haas
• 03:36   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Andrew Dunstan
• 03:46   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Tom Lane
• 04:24   Re: Bug in ILIKE? David E. Wheeler
• 05:30   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 06:45   About the parameter of API: PQprepared iihero
• 06:53   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 08:09   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 08:24   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 10:19   Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery Simon Riggs
• 10:35   Re: PostgreSQL future ideas Chris Browne
• 10:51   Re: Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl Markus Wanner
• 10:56   FSM rewrite: doc changes Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:56   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Russell Smith
• 11:41   Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery Simon Riggs
• 12:29   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Andrew Dunstan
• 12:37   Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 12:37   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Andrew Dunstan
• 12:44   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT
• 12:56   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Russell Smith
• 13:05   Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging Zdenek Kotala
• 13:19   Re: About the parameter of API: PQprepared Tom Lane
• 13:20   Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:25   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Andrew Dunstan
• 13:34   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Andrew Sullivan
• 13:39   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Andrew Sullivan
• 13:44   Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging Zdenek Kotala
• 14:05   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches KaiGai Kohei
• 15:00   planned maintenance downtime - tribble.postgresql.org Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 15:21   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Andrew Dunstan
• 15:39   Re: PostgreSQL future ideas A.M.
• 15:52   Re: PostgreSQL future ideas Andrew Dunstan
• 16:03   lock contention on parallel COPY ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 16:10   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:16   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Tom Lane
• 16:27   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 16:38   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 17:25   Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp) Brendan Jurd
• 17:36   Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp) Tom Lane
• 17:43   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: PostgreSQL future ideas Jonah H. Harris
• 17:53   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 17:55   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Simon Riggs
• 18:00   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Tom Lane
• 18:03   Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp) Alex Hunsaker
• 18:08   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 18:08   Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp) Tom Lane
• 18:26   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Simon Riggs
• 18:42   Re: About the parameter of API: PQprepared Merlin Moncure
• 19:23   Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ? Simon Riggs
• 19:39   Re: About the parameter of API: PQprepared Andrew Chernow
• 21:04   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 21:10   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Andrew Dunstan
• 21:21   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Joshua Drake
• 21:32   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Andrew Sullivan
• 22:11   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Bruce Momjian
• 22:15   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Bruce Momjian
• 22:23   Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch Andrew Dunstan
• 22:24   Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches Tom Lane
• 22:35   Re: PostgreSQL future ideas Chris Browne
• 22:43   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Andrew Dunstan
• 22:59   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Tom Lane
• 23:14   Re: [PATCH] allow has_table_privilege(..., 'usage') on sequences Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 23:30   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Andrew Dunstan
• 23:39   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Tom Lane
• 23:42   Re: Bug in ILIKE? Andrew Dunstan