Re: PostgreSQL future ideas - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Date
Msg-id 48DD0536.7030501@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL future ideas  ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL future ideas  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

A.M. wrote:
>
>
> Speaking of language choice, no one said that _all_ the source code 
> would need to be rewritten. It would be nice, for example, if 
> PostgreSQL rewrote the current GUC system with a glue language like 
> Lua (which is also very C-like).
>
>

No it wouldn't. All it would mean is that you'd need developers fluent 
in both languages.

If this were a greenfields project we might well now make choices other 
than those made in the past, but that doesn't mean we should constantly 
revisit those decisions.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "A.M."
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: lock contention on parallel COPY ?