Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches
Date
Msg-id 29382.1222467836@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches  ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I am confused how knowing that a sequence number used for a primary key
> exists or doesn't exist is leaking _meaningful_ information.  People
> might know the sequence number exists, but how is that information
> useful.  Now, if natural keys are used, that is a different story.

Right.  It might be that securing a database requires not just some
security mechanisms but also some database design rules (like "don't
allow foreign keys except on synthetic IDs").  But it seems to me that
we are just flailing around in the dark because we don't have that
bigger picture of how the features would actually get used.

The literature pointers that Andrew just gave us seem promising to me.
Who's going to go searching for some useful info?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch
Next
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL future ideas