Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

13 August 2008

• 00:00   Re: pgbench duration option Tom Lane
• 00:16   Re: Planner question Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: SeqScan costs Tom Lane
• 00:54   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Tom Lane
• 01:20   Re: temporary statistics option at initdb time Tom Lane
• 01:26   Re: SeqScan costs Simon Riggs
• 01:27   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Tom Lane
• 01:38   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Alvaro Herrera
• 01:45   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Robert Hodges
• 01:50   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Tom Lane
• 01:53   Re: Plugin system like Firefox Bruce Momjian
• 02:24   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Alvaro Herrera
• 02:29   Re: Plugin system like Firefox Dann Corbit
• 02:45   Re: pgbench duration option ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:36   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 06:06   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 06:07   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 06:12   Re: temporary statistics option at initdb time Magnus Hagander
• 06:19   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Magnus Hagander
• 06:27   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 06:59   Re: SeqScan costs Simon Riggs
• 07:15   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Stephen R. van den Berg
• 07:43   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Gregory Stark
• 08:11   C Extension woes Tim Hawes
• 08:18   Re: C Extension woes Jan Urbański
• 08:19   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Magnus Hagander
• 08:21   Re: C Extension woes Andrew Chernow
• 08:29   Patch: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg Dmitry Koterov
• 10:04   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 10:35   Re: temporary statistics option at initdb time Magnus Hagander
• 10:38   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner
• 10:46   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Stephen R. van den Berg
• 10:53   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 10:59   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Magnus Hagander
• 11:01   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Tom Lane
• 11:09   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Magnus Hagander
• 11:18   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Tom Lane
• 11:26   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Magnus Hagander
• 11:34   Re: C Extension woes Tom Lane
• 11:38   Re: Overhauling GUCS Michael Nacos
• 11:39   Re: C Extension woes Tim Hawes
• 12:03   Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE Bruce Momjian
• 12:11   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Kevin Grittner
• 12:18   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Bruce Momjian
• 12:27   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Bruce Momjian
• 12:42   Re: SeqScan costs Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT
• 12:46   Re: temporary statistics option at initdb time Decibel!
• 13:09   Re: benchmark farm Jaime Casanova
• 13:14   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 13:19   Re: C Extension woes Jan Urbański
• 13:35   Re: C Extension woes Tim Hawes
• 13:39   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 13:49   Re: SeqScan costs Decibel!
• 13:57   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Bruce Momjian
• 14:00   Re: temporary statistics option at initdb time Magnus Hagander
• 14:06   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Bruce Momjian
• 15:07   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Marko Kreen
• 16:03   Re: SeqScan costs Andrew Gierth
• 16:33   Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs
• 17:19   Re: benchmark farm Andy Colson
• 17:33   Re: Replay attack of query cancel Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:44   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Jan Urbański
• 17:52   Re: SeqScan costs Decibel!
• 18:28   autovacuum: use case for indenpedent TOAST table autovac settings Alvaro Herrera
• 18:59   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:02   Re: SeqScan costs Gregory Stark
• 21:40   WIP: patch to create explicit support for semi and anti joins Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: SeqScan costs Tom Lane
• 21:53   Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: use case for indenpedent TOAST table autovac settings Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: use case for indenpedent TOAST table autovac settings Alvaro Herrera
• 22:31   Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum: use case for indenpedent TOAST table autovac settings Tom Lane
• 22:33   Re: SeqScan costs Decibel!
• 22:39   Re: SeqScan costs Tom Lane
• 23:46   Re: compilig libpq with borland 5.5 Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   Re: WIP: patch to create explicit support for semi and anti joins David E. Wheeler