Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

15 November 2004

• 02:00   Re: code question: storing INTO relation Neil Conway
• 02:26   German-style quotes in the source file Serguei Mokhov
• 02:30   Re: postmaster segfaults with HUGE table Tom Lane
• 02:42   Re: code question: storing INTO relation Simon Riggs
• 02:53   Re: German-style quotes in the source file Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: IpcSemaphoreLock/Unlock and proc_exit on 7.2.6 Tom Lane
• 04:04   Re: IpcSemaphoreLock/Unlock and proc_exit on 7.2.6 Kris Jurka
• 04:10   Re: IpcSemaphoreLock/Unlock and proc_exit on 7.2.6 Tom Lane
• 06:14   Re: psql \e broken again Bruce Momjian
• 07:15   Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Neil Conway
• 07:39   Re: psql \e broken again joseph speigle
• 10:00   Re: MAX/MIN optimization via rewrite (plus query rewrites Greg Stark
• 10:09   Odd plpgsql behaviour Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 10:55   Re: MAX/MIN optimization via rewrite (plus query rewrites Dawid Kuroczko
• 11:46   Re: psql \e broken again Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 14:36   Re: Odd plpgsql behaviour Mike Rylander
• 15:35   Re: Concern about new PL/Perl Andrew Dunstan
• 15:43   Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Oleg Bartunov
• 17:51   Re: psql \e broken again Travis P
• 18:19   Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Tom Lane
• 18:30   Re: Odd plpgsql behaviour Tom Lane
• 18:42   Re: psql \e broken again Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: psql \e broken again Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 19:04   Re: Database reverse engineering Simon Riggs
• 19:10   Re: psql \e broken again Magnus Hagander
• 19:13   Re: psql \e broken again Magnus Hagander
• 19:14   Re: psql \e broken again Tom Lane
• 19:18   Re: psql \e broken again Magnus Hagander
• 19:24   Re: psql \e broken again Peter Eisentraut
• 19:39   Re: psql \e broken again Andreas Pflug
• 19:46   Re: Update TIP 9 please Robert Treat
• 19:55   libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE Tom Lane
• 20:07   Re: psql \e broken again Bort, Paul
• 20:19   Re: psql \e broken again Tom Lane
• 22:31   backend died Brusser, Michael
• 22:48   Re: backend died Tom Lane
• 23:02   Re: backend died Brusser, Michael
• 23:34   Re: backend died Tom Lane