Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>It seems that in the new PL/Perl, the result of the spi_exec_query
>function changes in meaning depending on the command. For a SELECT,
>the value of
>
>$res->{rows}
>
>is a reference to an array of the result rows.
>
>For a different command
>
>$res->{rows}
>
>is a scalar containing the number of affected rows. I think this is a
>poor design. Couldn't we have a different result field that always
>contains the number of rows?
>
>
I don't recall seeing any reply to this, but I'm inclined to agree with it.
Joshua, any comment from CP?
cheers
andrew
