Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >$res->{rows}
> >
> >is a reference to an array of the result rows.
> >
> >For a different command
> >
> >$res->{rows}
> >
> >is a scalar containing the number of affected rows.
> I don't recall seeing any reply to this, but I'm inclined to agree
> with it.
>
> Joshua, any comment from CP?
I think using "nrows" for the number of rows would be somewhat
consistent with the other PLs.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
