Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

26 September 2003

• 00:20   Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows Philip Yarra
• 01:18   Re: ctid matching behavior changed? Tom Lane
• 01:40   Oracle analytic functions Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:51   Re: Question on adding new indexes to Postgresql Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:10   Re: Error message cleanup Alvaro Herrera
• 03:22   feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:53   Re: Threads vs Processes Kurt at DBC
• 04:14   Re: Error message cleanup Tom Lane
• 05:58   Re: Threads vs Processes Claudio Natoli
• 06:26   Re: feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb Peter Eisentraut
• 06:28   Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum Shridhar Daithankar
• 06:35   Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows Shridhar Daithankar
• 06:51   Re: feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:00   Re: feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb Philip Yarra
• 07:19   Re: feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb Nigel J. Andrews
• 07:48   pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:54   Re: Threads vs Processes Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 09:35   Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing Andreas Pflug
• 10:10   Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? Sailesh Krishnamurthy
• 12:12   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Threads vs Processes Merlin Moncure
• 12:32   Re: Threads vs Processes Shridhar Daithankar
• 13:23   Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum Lamar Owen
• 13:49   Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum Hornyak Laszlo
• 14:21   Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb scott.marlowe
• 14:31   Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. Shridhar Daithankar
• 14:32   Re: feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Threads vs Processes Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: Threads vs Processes Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: Threads vs Processes Shridhar Daithankar
• 15:01   initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Matthew T. O'Connor
• 15:23   Re: feature request: show pgsql version when running initdb Andrew Dunstan
• 15:31   Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Threads vs Processes Andreas Pflug
• 16:01   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Michael Meskes
• 16:12   Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum Lamar Owen
• 16:15   Re: Threads vs Processes Bruce Momjian
• 16:26   Re: pg_dump and REVOKE on function Bruce Momjian
• 16:27   Re: Threads vs Processes Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: Threads vs Processes Bruce Momjian
• 16:43   Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. Stephan Szabo
• 16:59   Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. Tom Lane
• 17:21   Re: 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
• 17:34   Re: 2-phase commit Tom Lane
• 17:44   Re: Error message cleanup Peter Eisentraut
• 17:46   Re: 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
• 17:48   Re: 2-phase commit Marc G. Fournier
• 17:49   Re: 2-phase commit Marc G. Fournier
• 17:57   Re: 2-phase commit Patrick Welche
• 17:58   Re: 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
• 17:59   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Peter Eisentraut
• 18:05   Re: 2-phase commit Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 18:10   Re: 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
• 18:11   Metapa - PostgreSQL/Linux clustering for BI Ned Lilly
• 18:12   Re: Threads vs Processes Dann Corbit
• 18:13   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 18:21   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Andrew Dunstan
• 18:26   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 18:30   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 18:31   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 18:32   Re: 2-phase commit Marc G. Fournier
• 18:38   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 18:41   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Peter Eisentraut
• 18:46   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 18:46   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 19:02   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 19:19   Re: initdb failure Andrew Dunstan
• 19:32   Re: 2-phase commit Christopher Browne
• 19:36   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 19:37   Re: invalid tid errors in latest 7.3.4 stable. Stephan Szabo
• 19:39   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 19:40   Re: 2-phase commit Andrew Sullivan
• 19:44   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 19:44   Re: 2-phase commit Andrew Sullivan
• 19:51   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 19:57   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 19:59   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Michael Meskes
• 20:14   Re: 2-phase commit Marc G. Fournier
• 20:14   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 20:15   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 20:23   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:28   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:43   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 20:43   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 20:47   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Larry Rosenman
• 20:48   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:53   Re: 2-phase commit Rod Taylor
• 20:57   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 20:57   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) scott.marlowe
• 21:14   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 21:15   Re: 2-phase commit Rod Taylor
• 22:00   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Peter Eisentraut
• 22:02   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Peter Eisentraut
• 22:19   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 22:19   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 22:24   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Tom Lane
• 22:29   Re: 2-phase commit Mike Mascari
• 22:31   Re: 2-phase commit Gavin Sherry
• 22:34   Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) Bruce Momjian
• 22:48   Re: plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to boolean Bruce Momjian
• 22:53   Re: plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to boolean Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: [GENERAL] Can't Build 7.3.4 on OS X Tom Lane