Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Pflug
Subject Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing
Date
Msg-id 3F74084C.502@pse-consulting.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> I note there is no pretty printing option for pg_get_triggerdef...

Right.
There's no expression tree displayed, which would make the pretty print 
option necessary.

As long as we don't have reengineering functions for *all* objects, it 
doesn't make sense to implement pretty-print for line formatting on this 
single function.

Regards,
Andreas



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: Threads vs Processes
Next
From: Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant?