Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing
Date
Msg-id 20030927130849.T15218-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_get_triggerdef pretty printing  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ah, I was just thinking that you could do a nice multi-line version (same
as how they are dumped from 7.3.x)

But yes, it doesn't really matter.

Chris

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Andreas Pflug wrote:

> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > I note there is no pretty printing option for pg_get_triggerdef...
>
> Right.
> There's no expression tree displayed, which would make the pretty print
> option necessary.
>
> As long as we don't have reengineering functions for *all* objects, it
> doesn't make sense to implement pretty-print for line formatting on this
> single function.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of $(THREAD_CFLAGS) in CPPFLAGS
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Threads vs Processes