Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:49:30PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> ...
> > if we are talking two computers sitting next to each other on a switch,
> > you'd expect those to be low ... but if you were talking about two
> > seperate geographical locations (and yes, I realize you are adding lag to
> > the mix with waiting for responses), you'd expect those #s to rise ...
>
> Which I thought was the whole point of using a group communication protocol
> such as spread in postgresql-r. It seemed solved there...
Right, but I think we want to try to do two-phase commit without spread.
Spread seems overkill for this usage.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
