Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From scott.marlowe
Subject Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0309261436000.1253-100000@css120.ihs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > The argument that you want a warning because you might have mixed
> > newlines in the file seems less likely than this case where they are
> > using a literal carriage return as a data value at the end of the line.
> 
> I don't agree with that assessment.  Who actually has CRs in their data?

I do.  And so do lots of other people.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)