Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0309262225530.11938-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> The argument that you want a warning because you might have mixed
> newlines in the file seems less likely than this case where they are
> using a literal carriage return as a data value at the end of the line.

I don't agree with that assessment.  Who actually has CRs in their data?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)