Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Separate shared_buffer management process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Separate shared_buffer management process
Date
Msg-id 200309270201.h8R21XH27482@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Separate shared_buffer management process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Would it be a good idea to have a separate shared buffer process to
manage the cache?  Could such a process take workload off of the main
backend and improve their performance?

Just an idea?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Use of $(THREAD_CFLAGS) in CPPFLAGS