Re: initdb failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: initdb failure
Date
Msg-id 3F74910D.7070502@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>>I don't mind if we keep it on pure-POSIX platforms.  But one of the nicer
>>developments on Windows in recent(?) times is that you can actually use
>>any kind of line separator and most programs still work correctly (with
>>the notable exception of Notepad).
>>    
>>
>
>Not sure if we should make the behavior Windows-specific though.  And
>didn't Michael report seeing the same initdb failure on Debian?  That
>confuses me a bit --- why would there be a newline discrepancy on Debian?
>
>  
>
Is this affected by the fact that the platform where a dump is made 
might have a different line-end discipline from the one where the dump 
is restored?

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit