Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

5 November 2000

• 00:54   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Vadim Mikheev
• 01:02   Re: Alternative database locations are broken Vadim Mikheev
• 01:15   Re: Current CVS broken? Peter Mount
• 01:30   Re: [INTERFACES] DBD::Pg installation seems to fail with 7.1 libs Thomas Lockhart
• 01:36   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) Bruce Momjian
• 01:42   Re: problems with configure Peter Eisentraut
• 01:42   Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) Karl DeBisschop
• 01:52   INTERVAL representation Thomas Lockhart
• 02:06   v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:55   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Vadim Mikheev
• 08:04   Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Peter Eisentraut
• 09:15   Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman
• 10:06   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Hannu Krosing
• 10:38   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Peter Eisentraut
• 10:42   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Larry Rosenman
• 13:02   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Tom Lane
• 13:54   Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Adriaan Joubert
• 15:54   Re: Unicode conversion (Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql (configure.in)) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:59   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Larry Rosenman
• 16:20   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Hannu Krosing
• 16:25   Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution Larry Rosenman
• 19:58   ResetSystemCaches(was Re: relation ### modified while in use) Hiroshi Inoue
• 20:04   Re: Unicode conversion (Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql (configure.in)) Tatsuo Ishii
• 20:05   How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? The Hermit Hacker
• 21:28   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Tom Lane
• 21:43   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Bruce Momjian
• 21:47   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Tom Lane
• 21:52   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Philip Warner
• 21:53   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Philip Warner
• 21:55   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies?] Bruce Momjian
• 21:56   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Bruce Momjian
• 21:59   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? The Hermit Hacker
• 22:11   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Philip Warner
• 22:15   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? The Hermit Hacker
• 22:17   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Philip Warner
• 22:19   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Ron Chmara
• 22:36   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? The Hermit Hacker
• 22:37   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:00   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Bruce Momjian
• 23:01   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Tom Lane
• 23:04   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Bruce Momjian
• 23:16   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:20   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Bruce Momjian
• 23:27   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: How to get around LIKE inefficiencies? Bruce Momjian