Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution
Date
Msg-id 812.973447632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Responses Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
>> Uh, we don't want to depend on gcc, do we?

> Doesn't C99 *REQUIRE* long long?

What difference does that make?  It'll be a very long time before
Postgres can REQUIRE that people have a C99-compliant compiler.
Portability does not mean "we work great on just the newest and
spiffiest platforms"...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Transaction ID wraparound: problem and proposed solution
Next
From: Adriaan Joubert
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status