Mailing lists [pgsql-advocacy]

2 September 2007

• 00:52   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Jonah H. Harris
• 00:57   Re: Information Week article on PostgreSQL benchmark Jonah H. Harris
• 01:26   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Jan Wieck
• 03:28   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Jonah H. Harris
• 05:17   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Robert Treat
• 12:13   Re: All Wisconsin Circuit Courts now using PostgreSQL Kevin Grittner
• 12:15   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Marc G. Fournier
• 12:15   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Joshua D. Drake
• 12:19   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 13:53   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Chris Mair
• 15:19   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Jan Wieck
• 15:34   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Dave Page
• 15:58   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Joshua D. Drake
• 16:01   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Joshua D. Drake
• 16:07   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Joshua D. Drake
• 16:34   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Jan Wieck
• 17:38   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Andy Astor
• 17:45   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Marc G. Fournier
• 17:59   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Ron Mayer
• 18:13   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Ron Mayer
• 19:39   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Chris Mair
• 20:20   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Dave Page
• 20:24   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Dave Page
• 21:48   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Ron Mayer
• 22:55   Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Alvaro Herrera
• 23:14   A renaming analogy Andrew Sullivan