Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 200709020116.49150.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  ("John Wang" <johncwang@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Saturday 01 September 2007 13:57, John Wang wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > That doesnt make it a bad name. There are several very popular
> > > databases
> >
> > that
> >
> > > have SQL in thier name.
> >
> > But none that insist on pronunciations like "Mice Q. L." for "MySQL"
> > or "Microsofts Q. L. server" for "Microsoft SQL Server"
>
> Good point.

*shrug* it's orthogonal to the original posters assertation though.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: All Wisconsin Circuit Courts now using PostgreSQL