Thread: Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?
[Moving to pgsql-general] On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it > looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer > datetimes: > http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/ > > Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions > built with integer datetimes? > I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages quite easily, though. -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> quite easily, though.
ok. fair enough. thanks.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>: > > I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of > request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages > quite easily, though. But... aren't integer datetimes supposed to be the default, with float datetimes quickly becoming deprecated? Or does the current package (w/o the -id suffix) already implement that default? I don't run PG on Linux, but I imagine those who do might be interested in the answer ;) -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:52:28PM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> 2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
> >
> > I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> > request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> > quite easily, though.
>
> But... aren't integer datetimes supposed to be the default, with float
> datetimes quickly becoming deprecated?
> Or does the current package (w/o the -id suffix) already implement that default?
> I don't run PG on Linux, but I imagine those who do might be
> interested in the answer ;)
id is default in 8.4, and I am/was looking for 8.3.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>: > > [Moving to pgsql-general] > > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: >> we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it >> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer >> datetimes: >> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/ >> >> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions >> built with integer datetimes? >> > I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of > request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages > quite easily, though. > Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one. Robert Treat conjecture: xzilla.net consulting: omniti.com
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:16 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > > > Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used > on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one. They were in the previous repo -- anyway, I just update the spec file to 8.3.16: http://svn.pgrpms.org/browser/rpm/redhat/8.3/postgresql-intdatetime It also includes the patches. Anyway, here are the 8.3.16-id packages. I had some free cycles this morning, so I built them: http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/ http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-i386-id/repoview/ Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment
2011/11/3 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>: > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 13:16 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: >> > >> >> Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used >> on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one. > > They were in the previous repo -- anyway, I just update the spec file to > 8.3.16: > > http://svn.pgrpms.org/browser/rpm/redhat/8.3/postgresql-intdatetime > > It also includes the patches. > > Anyway, here are the 8.3.16-id packages. I had some free cycles this > morning, so I built them: > > http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/ > http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-i386-id/repoview/ > Oh, nice. Thanks Devrim! Robert Treat conjecture: xzilla.net consulting: omniti.com