Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?
Date
Msg-id CABV9wwNVfc6X=yQ17rXUCg7Z0QnPT52hneoX-HhszZnP4hPK2A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-general
2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
>
> [Moving to pgsql-general]
>
> On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>> we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it
>> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer
>> datetimes:
>> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/
>>
>> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions
>> built with integer datetimes?
>>
> I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> quite easily, though.
>

Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used
on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one.


Robert Treat
conjecture: xzilla.net
consulting: omniti.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Recommendations for SSDs in production?
Next
From: Alan Hodgson
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding the shared disk fail over cluster configuration