Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?
Date
Msg-id 1320010137.23279.4.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?  (hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>)
Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?  (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>)
Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?  (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>)
List pgsql-general
[Moving to pgsql-general]

On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it
> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer
> datetimes:
> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/
>
> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions
> built with integer datetimes?
>
I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
quite easily, though.

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Farber
Date:
Subject: Re: From select to delete
Next
From: "daflmx"
Date:
Subject: