Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From hubert depesz lubaczewski
Subject Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?
Date
Msg-id 20111031140614.GA4408@depesz.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?  (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:52:28PM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> 2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>:
> >
> > I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> > request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> > quite easily, though.
>
> But... aren't integer datetimes supposed to be the default, with float
> datetimes quickly becoming deprecated?
> Or does the current package (w/o the -id suffix) already implement that default?
> I don't run PG on Linux, but I imagine those who do might be
> interested in the answer ;)

id is default in 8.4, and I am/was looking for 8.3.

Best regards,

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
                                                             http://depesz.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?
Next
From: Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
Date:
Subject: [PL/pgSQL] function call