Thread: Recommendation of a slogan for PostgreSQL 8.2
After rereading the "Whats new" section of http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgrelease,
I recommend that PostgreSQL 8.2 should get a slogan "the polished release"
PostgreSQL 8.2 - the polished release
as a branding.
Because there are a great number of very important small additions. And as stated by Josh a substantial performance improvement. But I cannot see any single "big point" like the constraint exclusion from 8.1 or the WIN32 runability of 8.0.
And I think that's something PostgreSQL can and should be proud of: it is capable of releaseing a version with a miriad of small, helpfull improvements - without caring of having some "must-switch-elements" like commercial vendors need.
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Reinsburgstraße 202b
70197 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
-
Let's set so double the killer delete select all.
I recommend that PostgreSQL 8.2 should get a slogan "the polished release"
PostgreSQL 8.2 - the polished release
as a branding.
Because there are a great number of very important small additions. And as stated by Josh a substantial performance improvement. But I cannot see any single "big point" like the constraint exclusion from 8.1 or the WIN32 runability of 8.0.
And I think that's something PostgreSQL can and should be proud of: it is capable of releaseing a version with a miriad of small, helpfull improvements - without caring of having some "must-switch-elements" like commercial vendors need.
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Reinsburgstraße 202b
70197 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
-
Let's set so double the killer delete select all.
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 18:21 +0200, Harald Armin Massa wrote: > After rereading the "Whats new" section of http://momjian.us/cgi- > bin/pgrelease, > I recommend that PostgreSQL 8.2 should get a slogan "the polished > release" > > PostgreSQL 8.2 - the polished release > Just my opinion, but that doesn't sound like a catchy slogan. I think it might be a good idea to just say "performance". It is more of a statement because, in some circles, people do not associate PostgreSQL with performance, and it might be a good opportunity to ask them to re- evaluate PostgreSQL's performance. If we link to a simple performance guide, maybe that will get more people testing with settings other than the defaults. Maybe it would be useful to make a more directly-targeted guide like "before you benchmark PostgreSQL...". This guide could help people compare apples to apples. For instance, if they leave fsync on, make sure the database they compare against also protects the data. However, if we say "polish", who are we converting with that statement? PostgreSQL already has a polished perception. Maybe "usability" might be better? Both of my suggestions have already been mentioned, so I'm not claiming that these are my ideas. Regards, Jeff Davis
Harald Armin Massa wrote: > PostgreSQL 8.2 - the polished release That would seem to indicate that other releases are not polished, which is not an idea I would want to get out. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
I think we are going to say something like "This release touches almost every command and database facility, adding often-requested additions the user community has requested." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Harald Armin Massa wrote: > > PostgreSQL 8.2 - the polished release > > That would seem to indicate that other releases are not polished, which > is not an idea I would want to get out. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut > http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce, > I think we are going to say something like "This release touches almost > every command and database facility, adding often-requested additions > the user community has requested." Terrific, quote added to the draft. ;-) -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, > > > I think we are going to say something like "This release touches almost > > every command and database facility, adding often-requested additions > > the user community has requested." > > Terrific, quote added to the draft. ;-) Sorry, "requested" and "adding/additions" was used too much. This release touches almost every command and database facility, adding often-requested features the user community has been waiting for." -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruce, it looks like your email client is the one truncating the subject lines? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200609151930 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFCzecvJuQZxSWSsgRArwdAKDF6/dxvQqULgJBWJCikU5f66p0fgCgh3Yd 1OnWRx7k9mgk/zv1iSC3o1Y= =on/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Bruce, it looks like your email client is the one > truncating the subject lines? It's not the only one, and as I said, I doubt it's the mail client. I suggest Bruce looks at his "sent-mail" folder and check whether the mail he actually sent has a truncated subject or not. My guess is it doesn't. Just today, both Michelle (I forget her last name) and Martijn van Oosterhout (sorry if misspelled) posted with truncated subjects. I'm not sure why Michelle's first post wasn't truncated -- a guess is that the truncate only happens to replies, not to the first email of a thread. May this have something to do with the processing of the [pgsql-foo] thing? Oh, and I think I just noticed an unrelated bugs. It's not uncommon on the pgsql-es-ayuda list to have the [pgsql-es-ayuda] stuff prepended over and over again, like Subject: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] the real subject here (which makes the whole business of truncating subjects a lot more annoying obviously) My guess is that with funny subjects (i.e. those that get MIME-escaped), it (the prefix) gets mangled to the point that Majordomo doesn't recognize it, so it prepends it again leading to that dumb behavior. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
What email should I check? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > > Bruce, it looks like your email client is the one > > truncating the subject lines? > > It's not the only one, and as I said, I doubt it's the mail client. I > suggest Bruce looks at his "sent-mail" folder and check whether the mail > he actually sent has a truncated subject or not. My guess is it doesn't. > > Just today, both Michelle (I forget her last name) and Martijn van > Oosterhout (sorry if misspelled) posted with truncated subjects. I'm > not sure why Michelle's first post wasn't truncated -- a guess is that > the truncate only happens to replies, not to the first email of a > thread. May this have something to do with the processing of the > [pgsql-foo] thing? > > Oh, and I think I just noticed an unrelated bugs. It's not uncommon on > the pgsql-es-ayuda list to have the [pgsql-es-ayuda] stuff prepended > over and over again, like > > Subject: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] the real subject here > > (which makes the whole business of truncating subjects a lot more > annoying obviously) > > My guess is that with funny subjects (i.e. those that get MIME-escaped), > it (the prefix) gets mangled to the point that Majordomo doesn't > recognize it, so it prepends it again leading to that dumb behavior. > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > What email should I check? Please check this one: From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:44:39 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > What email should I check? > > Please check this one: > > From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> > To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:44:39 -0400 (EDT) > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - > > I download the mbox file for hackers and see only this line if I look at the mbox file: Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - information about current SSL What should I see? It looks the same in my mail reader. I mailed it to myself and it still looks the same. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > What email should I check? > > > > Please check this one: > > > > From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> > > To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > > CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > > Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:44:39 -0400 (EDT) > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - > > I download the mbox file for hackers and see only this line if I look at > the mbox file: > > Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - information about current SSL > > What should I see? It looks the same in my mail reader. I mailed it to > myself and it still looks the same. Um, I don't understand what you are saying. I downloaded this mbox: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/mbox/pgsql-hackers.2006-09.gz and I see this: From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> Message-Id: <200609041944.k84Jidx22930@momjian.us> Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - If I understand what you are saying above, the file on your local mbox has the complete line you show above. In that case I think I've proved that the subject is being truncated _after_ leaving your MUA. It could be the MTA software, but I doubt it. The theory I have is that it is Majordomo. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > What should I see? It looks the same in my mail reader. I mailed it to > > myself and it still looks the same. > > Um, I don't understand what you are saying. I downloaded this mbox: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/mbox/pgsql-hackers.2006-09.gz > > and I see this: > > From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> > Message-Id: <200609041944.k84Jidx22930@momjian.us> > Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - I think I looked an earlier email in that thread. For that message id, I do see a truncated subject. Let me reply to a full subject to hackers and let's see what we get. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Sep 15, 2006, at 9:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> >>>> What email should I check? >>> >>> Please check this one: >>> >>> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> >>> To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> >>> CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org >>> Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:44:39 -0400 (EDT) >>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - >> >> I download the mbox file for hackers and see only this line if I >> look at >> the mbox file: >> >> Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - >> information about current SSL >> >> What should I see? It looks the same in my mail reader. I mailed >> it to >> myself and it still looks the same. > > Um, I don't understand what you are saying. I downloaded this mbox: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/mbox/pgsql-hackers. > 2006-09.gz > > and I see this: > > From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> > Message-Id: <200609041944.k84Jidx22930@momjian.us> > Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - > > If I understand what you are saying above, the file on your local mbox > has the complete line you show above. In that case I think I've > proved > that the subject is being truncated _after_ leaving your MUA. > > It could be the MTA software, but I doubt it. The theory I have is > that > it is Majordomo. Does majordomo or the MTA it's using log subjects? Someone snooping around the log files would probably find this a lot faster than a bunch of guessing. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)