Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres

From: Bruce Momjian
Subject: Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres
Date: ,
Msg-id: 200609160022.k8G0M0m10006@momjian.us
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres 8.2)  (Alvaro Herrera)
Responses: Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres  (Alvaro Herrera)
List: pgsql-advocacy

Tree view

Recommendation of a slogan for PostgreSQL 8.2  ("Harald Armin Massa", )
 Re: Recommendation of a slogan for PostgreSQL 8.2  (Jeff Davis, )
 Re: Recommendation of a slogan for PostgreSQL 8.2  (Peter Eisentraut, )
  Re: Recommendation of a slogan for  (Bruce Momjian, )
   Re: Recommendation of a slogan for  (Josh Berkus, )
    Re: Recommendation of a slogan for  (Bruce Momjian, )
   Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres 8.2)  ("Greg Sabino Mullane", )
    Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres 8.2)  (Alvaro Herrera, )
     Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres  (Bruce Momjian, )
      Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres  (Alvaro Herrera, )
       Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres  (Bruce Momjian, )
        Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres  (Alvaro Herrera, )
         Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres  (Bruce Momjian, )
         Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres  (Jim Nasby, )

What email should I check?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> > Bruce, it looks like your email client is the one
> > truncating the subject lines?
>
> It's not the only one, and as I said, I doubt it's the mail client.  I
> suggest Bruce looks at his "sent-mail" folder and check whether the mail
> he actually sent has a truncated subject or not.  My guess is it doesn't.
>
> Just today, both Michelle (I forget her last name) and Martijn van
> Oosterhout (sorry if misspelled) posted with truncated subjects.  I'm
> not sure why Michelle's first post wasn't truncated -- a guess is that
> the truncate only happens to replies, not to the first email of a
> thread.  May this have something to do with the processing of the
> [pgsql-foo] thing?
>
> Oh, and I think I just noticed an unrelated bugs.  It's not uncommon on
> the pgsql-es-ayuda list to have the [pgsql-es-ayuda] stuff prepended
> over and over again, like
>
> Subject: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] the real subject here
>
> (which makes the whole business of truncating subjects a lot more
> annoying obviously)
>
> My guess is that with funny subjects (i.e. those that get MIME-escaped),
> it (the prefix) gets mangled to the point that Majordomo doesn't
> recognize it, so it prepends it again leading to that dumb behavior.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

--
  Bruce Momjian   
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-advocacy by date:

From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: SPI URL