Thread: ...

...

From
elein
Date:
Bcc:
Subject: Status: Organizing the OSCON presence
Reply-To:

This is where I think we are so far with regards
to OSCON2004.  If I've got something wrong or
too vague, please contact me.

We need more speakers as opposed to tutorial presenters.
We need verification on a few of the tutorial
subjects and lengths.

There are a few subject overlaps and I'm trying
to get more details and let the various people
work out the overlaps.

I will provide updates to this list
as new information becomes available.

--elein


===================================
This information is also on my wiki:
    http://cookie.varlena.com/BlueSky/OsCon2004
    htaccess: (varlena/varlena)
    wiki user: (varlena)
===================================
OSCON 2004

Contacts

    * PostgreSQL: Elein, Josh Berkus
    * OReilly Contact: chromatic

Off site get together

    * Joshua Drake @ Command Prompt

Swag

    * T-Shirts For Pg Conference goers: Greg Sabino Mullane
    * Other Swag TBD

Financing Speakers

    * Josh Berkus -- Might be some money available

Booth

    * Josh Berkus -- possibly money for this
    * Elein -- scheduling

General Speaker

    * Set up: Josh/Elein
    * State of PostgreSQL -- Bruce Momjian: Adoptions and Trends

BOF

    * Schedule -- elein

Tutorials

    * Joe Conway -- (?? day) Extending PostgreSQL with C?
    * Andrew Sullivan -- (1/2 day?) Erserver Replication
    * Elein -- TBD
    * Gavin Roy -- (1/2 day) Intro to PostgreSQL
    * Robert Bernier -- (1/2 day) Datamining email/Perl (and PostgreSQL??)
    * Greg Sabino Mullane -- (1/2 day) how to use the database to help your DBA and application writers get along with
otherby good use of "advanced" database features 
    * George Essig -- (1/2?? day) tsearch2
    * Gavin Sherry -- (1/2 day??) Advanced Features and 7.4 Enhancements
    * Josh Berkus -- (1/2 day??) Php and PostgreSQL

Talks

    * Joe Conway -- 7.4 enhancements Conflict with Gavin Sherry ?
    * Elein -- ORDBMS Concepts in PostgreSQL
    * We need more speakers for talks!

Topics Looking for Speakers

    * PostgreSQL on Windows
    * PostgreSQL Setup/Administration
    * Performance/Optimization
    * PostGIS
    * Datawarehousing
    * Server Side Programming languages: plpgsql, plpythonu, plperl, pltcl, plphp



Re:

From
Andrew Sullivan
Date:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:05:31PM -0800, elein wrote:
>     * PostgreSQL Setup/Administration
>     * Performance/Optimization
>     * Datawarehousing

I could talk about any of these if it would be helpful.  This again
depends on whether Jan is going -- I doubt very much that Afilias
will send us both.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
It never occurred to them that, if everyone had to think outside the box,
maybe it was the box that needed fixing.
        --Malcom Gladwell

Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
elein
Date:
I think it is important for you or Jan to do
a replication tutorial.

A talk (as opposed to a tutorial) on
admin stuff would also be very pertinent
since the feedback I am collecting
indicates that people do not think
that PostgreSQL is as easy to administer
as it is.

Can you let me know when you know for
sure what tutorial and talks you are
going to propose?

It would be great if we could find a
way for both you and Jan could come to oscon.

elein


On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:05:31PM -0800, elein wrote:
> >     * PostgreSQL Setup/Administration
> >     * Performance/Optimization
> >     * Datawarehousing
>
> I could talk about any of these if it would be helpful.  This again
> depends on whether Jan is going -- I doubt very much that Afilias
> will send us both.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
> It never occurred to them that, if everyone had to think outside the box,
> maybe it was the box that needed fixing.
>         --Malcom Gladwell
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
Andrew Sullivan
Date:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:59:44AM -0800, elein wrote:
> I think it is important for you or Jan to do
> a replication tutorial.

I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
system -- he's never had to administer it (fortunately for him), just
fix some bugs in it (unfortunately for him).  I think if he does a
talk on this, it'll have to be on his currently-in-progress system
instead.  (I do think, however, that people at OSCON are way more
likely to want to talk to Jan than to talk to me.  I'm a miserably
bad programmer, so I'm not really in a position to talk about what
we're doing next except in the broadest terms.)

> A talk (as opposed to a tutorial) on
> admin stuff would also be very pertinent
> since the feedback I am collecting
> indicates that people do not think
> that PostgreSQL is as easy to administer
> as it is.

Yes; I was actually wondering what to talk about for 45 minutes.  The
wonder about Postgres is that it mostly runs itself when everything
is going along nicely.

> Can you let me know when you know for
> sure what tutorial and talks you are
> going to propose?

I can propse both of these, then, if you like, assuming someone
better isn't volunteering.  (There are many better, I'm sure, and
I'll happily step out of the way for others.)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
        --Roger Brinner

Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
When is OSCON?  If you can propose the replication one, I *might* be able
to get Chris down to do the actual talk, since he has had experience on
both sides ... depends on when it is ...


On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:59:44AM -0800, elein wrote:
> > I think it is important for you or Jan to do
> > a replication tutorial.
>
> I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
> system -- he's never had to administer it (fortunately for him), just
> fix some bugs in it (unfortunately for him).  I think if he does a
> talk on this, it'll have to be on his currently-in-progress system
> instead.  (I do think, however, that people at OSCON are way more
> likely to want to talk to Jan than to talk to me.  I'm a miserably
> bad programmer, so I'm not really in a position to talk about what
> we're doing next except in the broadest terms.)
>
> > A talk (as opposed to a tutorial) on
> > admin stuff would also be very pertinent
> > since the feedback I am collecting
> > indicates that people do not think
> > that PostgreSQL is as easy to administer
> > as it is.
>
> Yes; I was actually wondering what to talk about for 45 minutes.  The
> wonder about Postgres is that it mostly runs itself when everything
> is going along nicely.
>
> > Can you let me know when you know for
> > sure what tutorial and talks you are
> > going to propose?
>
> I can propse both of these, then, if you like, assuming someone
> better isn't volunteering.  (There are many better, I'm sure, and
> I'll happily step out of the way for others.)
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
> The plural of anecdote is not data.
>         --Roger Brinner
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
Josh Berkus
Date:
Elein,

> I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
> system --

(Jan, please correct me if any of the below is wrong)

Jan's not going to do this; I had a talk with him on the phone.   He doesn't
want to do any presentations on Slony-I until he has a working version, which
will probably not be before OSCON.    And he doesn't want to commit to doing
a presentation on ARC/BGWriter either.

Right now, he's not committed to attending.   Maybe we'll see him there, maybe
not.

--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
"scott.marlowe"
Date:
It's a great convention, where mostly the geeks get together and get to
know one another and learn.  Put on by O'Reilly:

http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2004/

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>
> When is OSCON?  If you can propose the replication one, I *might* be able
> to get Chris down to do the actual talk, since he has had experience on
> both sides ... depends on when it is ...
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:59:44AM -0800, elein wrote:
> > > I think it is important for you or Jan to do
> > > a replication tutorial.
> >
> > I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
> > system -- he's never had to administer it (fortunately for him), just
> > fix some bugs in it (unfortunately for him).  I think if he does a
> > talk on this, it'll have to be on his currently-in-progress system
> > instead.  (I do think, however, that people at OSCON are way more
> > likely to want to talk to Jan than to talk to me.  I'm a miserably
> > bad programmer, so I'm not really in a position to talk about what
> > we're doing next except in the broadest terms.)
> >
> > > A talk (as opposed to a tutorial) on
> > > admin stuff would also be very pertinent
> > > since the feedback I am collecting
> > > indicates that people do not think
> > > that PostgreSQL is as easy to administer
> > > as it is.
> >
> > Yes; I was actually wondering what to talk about for 45 minutes.  The
> > wonder about Postgres is that it mostly runs itself when everything
> > is going along nicely.
> >
> > > Can you let me know when you know for
> > > sure what tutorial and talks you are
> > > going to propose?
> >
> > I can propse both of these, then, if you like, assuming someone
> > better isn't volunteering.  (There are many better, I'm sure, and
> > I'll happily step out of the way for others.)
> >
> > A
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
> > The plural of anecdote is not data.
> >         --Roger Brinner
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> >       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> >       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>


Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
Robert Bernier
Date:

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>When is OSCON?  If you can propose the replication one, I *might* be able
>to get Chris down to do the actual talk, since he has had experience on
>both sides ... depends on when it is ...
>
>
>
>

July 26-30



Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
Andrew Sullivan
Date:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:49:28PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> When is OSCON?  If you can propose the replication one, I *might* be able
> to get Chris down to do the actual talk, since he has had experience on
> both sides ... depends on when it is ...

The OSCON rules are clear that the person making the proposal needs
to be the person who actualy gives the talk.  So If he's going to
give it, he'll have to propose it.

OSCON is 26-30 July.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
                --Brad Holland

Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:49:28PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > When is OSCON?  If you can propose the replication one, I *might* be able
> > to get Chris down to do the actual talk, since he has had experience on
> > both sides ... depends on when it is ...
>
> The OSCON rules are clear that the person making the proposal needs
> to be the person who actualy gives the talk.  So If he's going to
> give it, he'll have to propose it.

Damn, was afraid of that :(  I may not know until after the deadline
whether I can get him there or not :(

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
Jan Wieck
Date:
Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:59:44AM -0800, elein wrote:
>> I think it is important for you or Jan to do
>> a replication tutorial.
>
> I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
> system -- he's never had to administer it (fortunately for him), just
> fix some bugs in it (unfortunately for him).  I think if he does a
> talk on this, it'll have to be on his currently-in-progress system
> instead.  (I do think, however, that people at OSCON are way more
> likely to want to talk to Jan than to talk to me.  I'm a miserably
> bad programmer, so I'm not really in a position to talk about what
> we're doing next except in the broadest terms.)

That's probably true. I'm just back from LinuxWorld and on that BOF the
responses to an "extremely brief" intro to what's coming with Slony-I
was several "two thumbs up". And there where quite some people who
wanted to talk about some of the finer details after the BOF.

As Andrew said, I can't say much about living with the stuff I want to
replace anyway, so what I would have to talk about is what I'm actually
developing. I hope to have something working by the time of the
conference, but as of now I am in the early stages of implementing.

I am next week in Toronto and will discuss the issue with Andrew and
Janusz (the guy I'm reporting to and who in the end would have to nod).


Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
Jan Wieck
Date:
Josh Berkus wrote:

> Elein,
>
>> I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
>> system --
>
> (Jan, please correct me if any of the below is wrong)
>
> Jan's not going to do this; I had a talk with him on the phone.   He doesn't
> want to do any presentations on Slony-I until he has a working version, which
> will probably not be before OSCON.    And he doesn't want to commit to doing
> a presentation on ARC/BGWriter either.

ARC/BGwriter would be a completely different topic. And on advanced
algorithms like this, one can expect the audience to start snoring,
evaporating or doing other unpleasant things after about 30 minutes or
so. I can for sure "talk" about things like that for days, but the key
is to have people who listen!

Let's see what comes out of my Toronto trip, okay?


Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
"Chris Travers"
Date:
Hi all;

I am considering doing a talk (not a tutorial) on how the advanced features
of PostgreSQL allow for extremely powerful business databases.  An abstract
follows:
Many application developers working with relational database systems are
used to using the database as a simple data store. However PostgreSQL allows
for far more sophisticated "active," or self-managing databases to be
developed. Many business applications can benefit from using an active
database. This paper explored how views, rules, triggers, and functions can
be used in order to create an active database. The Open Reservation
Management System database (http://sourceforge.net/projects/openres, not yet
stable) will be used as an example, as will the HERMES CRM database system
(http://hermesweb.sourceforge.net).

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Cc: <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>; <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Status: OSCON organization


> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:59:44AM -0800, elein wrote:
> > I think it is important for you or Jan to do
> > a replication tutorial.
>
> I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
> system -- he's never had to administer it (fortunately for him), just
> fix some bugs in it (unfortunately for him).  I think if he does a
> talk on this, it'll have to be on his currently-in-progress system
> instead.  (I do think, however, that people at OSCON are way more
> likely to want to talk to Jan than to talk to me.  I'm a miserably
> bad programmer, so I'm not really in a position to talk about what
> we're doing next except in the broadest terms.)
>
> > A talk (as opposed to a tutorial) on
> > admin stuff would also be very pertinent
> > since the feedback I am collecting
> > indicates that people do not think
> > that PostgreSQL is as easy to administer
> > as it is.
>
> Yes; I was actually wondering what to talk about for 45 minutes.  The
> wonder about Postgres is that it mostly runs itself when everything
> is going along nicely.
>
> > Can you let me know when you know for
> > sure what tutorial and talks you are
> > going to propose?
>
> I can propse both of these, then, if you like, assuming someone
> better isn't volunteering.  (There are many better, I'm sure, and
> I'll happily step out of the way for others.)
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
> The plural of anecdote is not data.
> --Roger Brinner
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>


Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
Robert Treat
Date:
Sounds interesting.. you might also want to look at the gforge project
which uses a lot of those types of features. I was thinking of doing
something similar (though probably a tutorial) on using views and
pllangs to save your self from excessive recoding of client
applications. I planned to base it on some real life examples but not
any one specific apps.

Incidentally, I don't think it hurts to have multiple people doing
submissions on similar topics, since theres no guarantee that any
particular talk/tutorial will actually get picked.

Robert Treat

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 06:04, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I am considering doing a talk (not a tutorial) on how the advanced features
> of PostgreSQL allow for extremely powerful business databases.  An abstract
> follows:
> Many application developers working with relational database systems are
> used to using the database as a simple data store. However PostgreSQL allows
> for far more sophisticated "active," or self-managing databases to be
> developed. Many business applications can benefit from using an active
> database. This paper explored how views, rules, triggers, and functions can
> be used in order to create an active database. The Open Reservation
> Management System database (http://sourceforge.net/projects/openres, not yet
> stable) will be used as an example, as will the HERMES CRM database system
> (http://hermesweb.sourceforge.net).
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
> To: <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
> Cc: <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>; <janwieck@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Status: OSCON organization
>
>
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:59:44AM -0800, elein wrote:
> > > I think it is important for you or Jan to do
> > > a replication tutorial.
> >
> > I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
> > system -- he's never had to administer it (fortunately for him), just
> > fix some bugs in it (unfortunately for him).  I think if he does a
> > talk on this, it'll have to be on his currently-in-progress system
> > instead.  (I do think, however, that people at OSCON are way more
> > likely to want to talk to Jan than to talk to me.  I'm a miserably
> > bad programmer, so I'm not really in a position to talk about what
> > we're doing next except in the broadest terms.)
> >
> > > A talk (as opposed to a tutorial) on
> > > admin stuff would also be very pertinent
> > > since the feedback I am collecting
> > > indicates that people do not think
> > > that PostgreSQL is as easy to administer
> > > as it is.
> >
> > Yes; I was actually wondering what to talk about for 45 minutes.  The
> > wonder about Postgres is that it mostly runs itself when everything
> > is going along nicely.
> >
> > > Can you let me know when you know for
> > > sure what tutorial and talks you are
> > > going to propose?
> >
> > I can propse both of these, then, if you like, assuming someone
> > better isn't volunteering.  (There are many better, I'm sure, and
> > I'll happily step out of the way for others.)
> >
> > A
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
> > The plural of anecdote is not data.
> > --Roger Brinner
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> >       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> >       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
elein
Date:
Your point is well taken.  But it is important to
have some semblance of coordination--it will look
good if we all are on the same page giving the
same messages.

elein

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:42:08AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> Sounds interesting.. you might also want to look at the gforge project
> which uses a lot of those types of features. I was thinking of doing
> something similar (though probably a tutorial) on using views and
> pllangs to save your self from excessive recoding of client
> applications. I planned to base it on some real life examples but not
> any one specific apps.
>
> Incidentally, I don't think it hurts to have multiple people doing
> submissions on similar topics, since theres no guarantee that any
> particular talk/tutorial will actually get picked.
>
> Robert Treat
>
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 06:04, Chris Travers wrote:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > I am considering doing a talk (not a tutorial) on how the advanced features
> > of PostgreSQL allow for extremely powerful business databases.  An abstract
> > follows:
> > Many application developers working with relational database systems are
> > used to using the database as a simple data store. However PostgreSQL allows
> > for far more sophisticated "active," or self-managing databases to be
> > developed. Many business applications can benefit from using an active
> > database. This paper explored how views, rules, triggers, and functions can
> > be used in order to create an active database. The Open Reservation
> > Management System database (http://sourceforge.net/projects/openres, not yet
> > stable) will be used as an example, as will the HERMES CRM database system
> > (http://hermesweb.sourceforge.net).
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> > Chris Travers
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
> > To: <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
> > Cc: <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>; <janwieck@yahoo.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:43 AM
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Status: OSCON organization
> >
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:59:44AM -0800, elein wrote:
> > > > I think it is important for you or Jan to do
> > > > a replication tutorial.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure that Jan can do a tutorial on the actual replication
> > > system -- he's never had to administer it (fortunately for him), just
> > > fix some bugs in it (unfortunately for him).  I think if he does a
> > > talk on this, it'll have to be on his currently-in-progress system
> > > instead.  (I do think, however, that people at OSCON are way more
> > > likely to want to talk to Jan than to talk to me.  I'm a miserably
> > > bad programmer, so I'm not really in a position to talk about what
> > > we're doing next except in the broadest terms.)
> > >
> > > > A talk (as opposed to a tutorial) on
> > > > admin stuff would also be very pertinent
> > > > since the feedback I am collecting
> > > > indicates that people do not think
> > > > that PostgreSQL is as easy to administer
> > > > as it is.
> > >
> > > Yes; I was actually wondering what to talk about for 45 minutes.  The
> > > wonder about Postgres is that it mostly runs itself when everything
> > > is going along nicely.
> > >
> > > > Can you let me know when you know for
> > > > sure what tutorial and talks you are
> > > > going to propose?
> > >
> > > I can propse both of these, then, if you like, assuming someone
> > > better isn't volunteering.  (There are many better, I'm sure, and
> > > I'll happily step out of the way for others.)
> > >
> > > A
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
> > > The plural of anecdote is not data.
> > > --Roger Brinner
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > >       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> > >       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
> --
> Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: Status: OSCON organization

From
"Chris Travers"
Date:
Tutorials and talks on the same subjects are also good for another reason:

Tutorials focus on the actual techniques and how to use the features, while
talks can more easily focus on high-level strategy regarding solving a
problem.  For me it is not an either-or proposition, but rather it is ideal
situation is to have both talks and tutorials on similar topics, but
coordinate with eachother.

My approach was to use two very different systems and show how various
problems can be solved using these approaches.  HERMES assumes that all
information is live and also transactional, while the Open Reservation
Management System assumes that information needs to be archived and
reconstructed for specific dates for analytical operations (i.e. what was
the vacancy rate for January 12, 2003 for all rooms with double beds).

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers