Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

13 June 2006

• 00:26   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Stephen Frost
• 00:29   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Bill Moran
• 01:14   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Joshua D. Drake
• 01:29   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Steve Atkins
• 01:50   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• 02:16   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 02:26   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Alex Turner
• 02:38   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
• 02:44   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Tom Lane
• 02:52   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
• 02:57   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• 03:00   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? David Wheeler
• 03:05   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Leigh Dyer
• 04:06   Re: scaling up postgres Zydoon
• 04:34   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Josh Berkus
• 06:27   Re: function not called if part of aggregate Craig A. James
• 06:31   Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic) Steinar H. Gunderson
• 06:37   Re: Posrgres speed problem Ruben Rubio Rey
• 06:44   Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Ruben Rubio Rey
• 07:00   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? J. Andrew Rogers
• 08:11   Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Guido Neitzer
• 08:17   Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? Ruben Rubio Rey
• 08:40   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Nis Jorgensen
• 09:04   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• 10:34   Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved! Ruben Rubio Rey
• 10:47   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? PFC
• 11:33   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• 11:48   Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved! Guido Neitzer
• 11:56   Re: Interesting slow query PFC
• 12:03   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• 12:38   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Christopher Browne
• 12:42   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• 12:43   OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Antoine
• 12:47   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• 12:50   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Luke Lonergan
• 12:52   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Sven Geisler
• 13:15   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Andreas Pflug
• 13:46   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? J. Andrew Rogers
• 14:37   Re: function not called if part of aggregate Tom Lane
• 16:12   Re: Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic) Stephen Frost
• 17:53   Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Shaun Thomas
• 18:02   Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Steve Poe
• 18:09   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Tom Lane
• 18:17   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Marcin Mank
• 19:00   Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Scott Marlowe
• 19:04   Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Chris Browne
• 19:11   Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? David Boreham
• 19:15   Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
• 19:28   Re: scaling up postgres Scott Marlowe
• 19:38   Re: scaling up postgres Gavin Hamill
• 19:43   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Jim C. Nasby
• 19:44   Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Joshua D. Drake
• 20:08   Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? Jim C. Nasby
• 20:11   Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Dave Page
• 20:13   Re: scaling up postgres PFC
• 20:55   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
• 21:03   Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? Jim C. Nasby
• 21:07   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 tree Tom Lane
• 21:17   Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? Jim C. Nasby
• 21:21   Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
• 21:31   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• 21:36   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
• 21:41   Re: scaling up postgres John Vincent
• 21:54   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• 21:55   Re: scaling up postgres Zydoon
• 22:04   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Tom Lane
• 22:05   Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
• 22:13   Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• 22:21   Re: scaling up postgres John Vincent
• 22:22   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Michael Fuhr
• 22:40   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• 22:42   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Shaun Thomas
• 22:45   Re: scaling up postgres Jim C. Nasby
• 22:48   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
• 22:54   Re: Confirmation of bad query plan generated by 7.4 Jim C. Nasby
• 22:55   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Joshua D. Drake
• 22:56   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• 23:12   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg
• 23:17   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Jim C. Nasby
• 23:53   Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly? Mischa Sandberg