Mailing lists [pgsql-patches]

1 December 2000

• 00:25   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Bierman
• 03:29   Re: darwin pgsql patches Thomas Lockhart
• 04:07   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Bierman
• 04:47   Re: darwin pgsql patches Thomas Lockhart
• 05:03   Re: darwin pgsql patches Tom Lane
• 06:37   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Bierman
• 06:51   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Bierman
• 14:21   Re: darwin pgsql patches Tom Lane

2 December 2000

• 15:30   Re: darwin pgsql patches Tom Lane

5 December 2000

• 04:03   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Bierman
• 04:31   Re: darwin pgsql patches Tom Lane
• 04:45   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Bierman
• 14:29   Re: darwin pgsql patches Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Eisentraut
• 15:43   Re: darwin pgsql patches Ian Lance Taylor
• 15:46   Re: darwin pgsql patches Tom Lane
• 16:08   Fixes for checking unique constraints on RI creation Stephan Szabo
• 16:57   Re: darwin pgsql patches Ian Lance Taylor
• 17:46   Re: darwin pgsql patches Tom Lane
• 18:03   Re: Fixes for checking unique constraints on RI creation Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Eisentraut

6 December 2000

• 02:59   Diff to fix SQLForeignKeys in ODBC Michael Fork
• 03:37   Re: Diff to fix SQLForeignKeys in ODBC Michael Fork
• 23:26   ODBC Driver patch Michael Fork

7 December 2000

• 22:11   new darwin patches Peter Bierman
• 23:06   Re: new darwin patches Tom Lane
• 23:36   Re: new darwin patches Peter Bierman

10 December 2000

• 21:15   Re: Diff to fix SQLForeignKeys in ODBC Bruce Momjian
• 22:17   Re: ODBC Driver patch Bruce Momjian
• 22:57   Re: new darwin patches Tom Lane

11 December 2000

• 01:22   Re: new darwin patches Peter Bierman
• 15:20   Re: new darwin patches Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: ODBC Driver patch Peter Eisentraut
• 17:34   Re: ODBC Driver patch Bruce Momjian
• 19:22   Re: ODBC Driver patch Michael Fork
• 20:32   Re: new darwin patches Peter Bierman

12 December 2000

• 12:05   Re: darwin pgsql patches Peter Bierman
• 18:38   http://www.se.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-patches/2000-06/msg00012.html Nacho Viejo

14 December 2000

• 13:40   7.1: to_char() bug fix Karel Zak

15 December 2000

• 18:04   Re: 7.1: to_char() bug fix Bruce Momjian
• 23:34   Planner speedup diffs Tom Lane

16 December 2000

• 19:08   Bug fix Michael Davis

17 December 2000

• 00:44   Re: Bug fix Tom Lane
• 23:02   Re: Cleaning up backend-exit cleanup Tom Lane
• 23:46   --enable-odbc issue for Darwin/Mac OS X Ronald Guest

18 December 2000

• 00:09   Re: --enable-odbc issue for Darwin/Mac OS X Tom Lane
• 02:04   Bug fix Michael Davis

19 December 2000

• 01:09   sql -> xls or dbf BigFace
• 15:59   Re: --enable-odbc issue for Darwin/Mac OS X Peter Eisentraut

20 December 2000

• 16:38   stupid patches to compile cvs docs with debian andrea gelmini

21 December 2000

• 14:56   RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Magnus Hagander
• 15:52   Re: stupid patches to compile cvs docs with debian Peter Eisentraut
• 16:05   spelling mistake Alfred Perlstein
• 16:47   Re: spelling mistake Bruce Momjian
• 17:15   Re: RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Bruce Momjian
• 17:22   Re: stupid patches to compile cvs docs with debian Peter Eisentraut

22 December 2000

• 00:32   patch for character set encoding detection for JDBC Barry Lind
• 01:09   Re: patch for character set encoding detection for JDBC Bruce Momjian
• 09:10   RE: RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH] Magnus Hagander

26 December 2000

• 17:41   Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 18:30   Two minor fixes to reduce resource usage in JDBC drivers Barry Lind
• 18:47   Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 21:03   Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner

27 December 2000

• 02:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 09:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 13:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 21:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 21:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Brent Verner
• 22:48   [patch] src/include/storage/s_lock.h Brent Verner
• 23:02   Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane

28 December 2000

• 21:57   Re: [INTERFACES] Two minor fixes to reduce resource usage in JDBC drivers Bruce Momjian

29 December 2000

• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Tom Lane
• 20:09   Re: [HACKERS] Notify with Rules bugs? Tom Lane

30 December 2000

• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 01:25   Notify with Rules bugs? sergiop@sinectis.com.ar
• 01:25   Re: sql -> xls or dbf oj