Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

14 April 2020

• 00:23   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 01:01   Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists Michael Paquier
• 01:11   Re: [patch] some PQExpBuffer are not destroyed in pg_dump Michael Paquier
• 01:32   Re: wrong relkind error messages Michael Paquier
• 01:34   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Tom Lane
• 01:38   Re: 001_rep_changes.pl stalls Noah Misch
• 01:45   Re: 001_rep_changes.pl stalls Tom Lane
• 01:50   Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Richard Guo
• 01:57   Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Michael Paquier
• 02:22   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Michael Paquier
• 02:32   Should program exit, When close() failed for O_RDONLY mode Lin, Cuiping
• 02:35   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 02:53   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Amit Kapila
• 03:25   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Amit Kapila
• 03:57   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Amit Kapila
• 03:58   variation of row_number with parallel Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
• 04:06   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Masahiko Sawada
• 04:08   Re: variation of row_number with parallel Pavel Stehule
• 04:18   Re: variation of row_number with parallel Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
• 05:23   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Fabien COELHO
• 05:46   Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates David Rowley
• 05:47   Re: doc review for v13 Michael Paquier
• 05:49   Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists Fabien COELHO
• 06:34   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Amit Kapila
• 06:43   index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote
• 06:53   Incremental sorts and EXEC_FLAG_REWIND Michael Paquier
• 07:12   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Richard Guo
• 07:17   Re: pgsql: Improve handling of parameter differences in physicalreplicatio Peter Eisentraut
• 07:37   Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019 davinder singh
• 07:39   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote
• 08:17   Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule
• 08:27   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud
• 08:29   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Andy Fan
• 08:35   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule
• 08:40   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Amit Langote
• 08:49   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud
• 08:54   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud
• 08:58   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote
• 09:00   Re: Lexer issues Julien Rouhaud
• 09:09   Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey David Rowley
• 09:12   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Andy Fan
• 09:19   Re: Index Skip Scan David Rowley
• 09:20   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Andy Fan
• 09:24   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule
• 09:26   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule
• 09:27   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Amit Kapila
• 09:34   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Julien Rouhaud
• 09:35   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 09:45   Re: Display of buffers for planning time show nothing for second run Pavel Stehule
• 09:52   Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed Anna Akenteva
• 10:10   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 10:11   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 10:27   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Amit Kapila
• 10:36   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 12:33   Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup Asif Rehman
• 13:01   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:32   Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup Kashif Zeeshan
• 13:41   While restoring -getting error if dump contain sql statementsgenerated from generated.sql file tushar
• 13:52   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andreas Karlsson
• 14:16   Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas
• 14:16   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Amit Langote
• 14:20   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 14:34   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup Asif Rehman
• 14:39   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andreas Karlsson
• 14:52   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas
• 15:08   Re: where should I stick that backup? Stephen Frost
• 15:26   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Jesse Zhang
• 15:38   Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas
• 15:41   Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Tom Lane
• 15:41   PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019 Ranier Vilela
• 15:44   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Erik Rijkers
• 15:47   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas
• 15:57   Re: cleaning perl code Andrew Dunstan
• 16:03   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 16:49   ERROR: could not determine which collation to use for stringcomparison Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 16:56   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 17:12   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele
• 17:16   Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort James Coleman
• 17:27   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera
• 17:33   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele
• 18:43   Re: index paths and enable_indexscan Robert Haas
• 19:00   Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? Hamid Akhtar
• 19:03   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan
• 19:04   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Teja Mupparti
• 19:13   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Robert Haas
• 19:19   Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? Robert Haas
• 19:19   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele
• 19:40   Re: Parallel copy Kuntal Ghosh
• 19:55   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan
• 20:01   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele
• 20:09   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera
• 20:11   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera
• 20:32   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan
• 20:40   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele
• 20:44   Re: cleaning perl code Alvaro Herrera
• 20:49   Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup Robert Haas
• 21:31   Re: ERROR: could not determine which collation to use for string comparison Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston
• 22:36   Re: wrong relkind error messages Alvaro Herrera
• 22:39   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 22:41   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 23:02   Re: wrong relkind error messages Alvaro Herrera