Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY17rZ9ytwci_odp36JmJzNTpP6F8pkACVFnoBYasY77Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:23 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 07:55:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Oh, hmm. Maybe I'm getting confused with a previous version of the
> > patch that behaved differently.
>
> No problem.  If you prefer keeping this part of the code, that's fine
> by me.  If you think that the patch is suited as-is, including
> silencing the error forcing to use --no-manifest on server versions
> older than v13, I am fine to help out and apply it myself, but I am
> also fine if you wish to take care of it by yourself.

Feel free to go ahead.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teja Mupparti
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server?