Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

6 August 2015

• 01:09   Re: raw output from copy Andrew Dunstan
• 03:15   Re: [PATCH] libpq: Allow specifying multiple host names to try to connect to Michael Paquier
• 03:21   Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); Michael Paquier
• 03:28   Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. Bruce Momjian
• 04:16   Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies Noah Misch
• 04:39   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Noah Misch
• 05:55   Re: deparsing utility commands Alvaro Herrera
• 05:57   Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. Alvaro Herrera
• 06:18   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Tom Lane
• 06:24   Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. Bruce Momjian
• 06:28   Re: Caching offsets of varlena attributes Haribabu Kommi
• 06:31   Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend Amit Kapila
• 06:35   Re: Hash index creation warning Bruce Momjian
• 07:54   Re: pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts Fabien COELHO
• 09:54   Re: Priority table or Cache table Haribabu Kommi
• 10:02   Re: [PATCH] libpq: Allow specifying multiple host names to try to connect to Mikko Tiihonen
• 10:09   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Andres Freund
• 11:37   Re: raw output from copy Pavel Stehule
• 13:01   Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive Ildus Kurbangaliev
• 13:56   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Andres Freund
• 16:03   Thinko in processing of SHM message size info? Antonin Houska
• 16:37   Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique Uriy Zhuravlev
• 17:09   Race conditions in shm_mq.c Antonin Houska
• 17:28   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Tom Lane
• 17:29   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Robert Haas
• 17:32   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Andres Freund
• 17:33   Re: 9.5 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 17:41   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Andres Freund
• 17:44   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Robert Haas
• 17:45   Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique Erik Rijkers
• 17:46   Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies Stephen Frost
• 18:05   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:21   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Andres Freund
• 18:26   Re: deparsing utility commands Jim Nasby
• 18:29   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:32   Re: deparsing utility commands Alvaro Herrera
• 18:33   Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. Jim Nasby
• 18:34   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Andres Freund
• 18:39   obsolete comments for InitializeMaxBackends Robert Haas
• 18:43   Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 Alvaro Herrera
• 19:06   Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention Robert Haas
• 20:23   Re: Removing unreferenced files Joshua D. Drake
• 20:24   Re: Thinko in processing of SHM message size info? Robert Haas
• 20:29   Re: Thinko in processing of SHM message size info? Robert Haas
• 20:48   Re: 9.5 release notes Robert Haas
• 20:51   Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 21:03   [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in analyzejoins.c Andreas Seltenreich
• 21:14   Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. Simon Riggs
• 21:19   cache invalidation skip logic Qingqing Zhou
• 21:19   Fwd: 9.5 release notes Jeff Janes
• 21:38   Re: Race conditions in shm_mq.c Robert Haas
• 21:46   Re: Race conditions in shm_mq.c Robert Haas
• 22:14   Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Josh Berkus
• 22:27   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Simon Riggs
• 22:45   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Josh Berkus
• 23:08   Re: 9.5 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 23:11   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Simon Riggs
• 23:14   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Josh Berkus
• 23:17   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Josh Berkus
• 23:19   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Simon Riggs
• 23:22   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Petr Jelinek
• 23:25   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Josh Berkus
• 23:26   Re: 9.5 release notes Peter Geoghegan
• 23:45   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Petr Jelinek
• 23:53   Re: Bug? Small samples in TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM returns zero rows Alvaro Herrera