On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> I am using the same criteria I have always used. If you would like it
> changed, we need to discuss it at a macro level, not for individual
> cases where we feel someone didn't get enough _credit_.
I don't know how you can say that no *user* cares about Rajeev's
B-Tree contribution on the one hand, but on the other hand add items
about things like hash index crash-safety warnings, or an entire
section on obscure source code changes, with commentary about memory
ordering considerations, for example.
> And, I will restate this again, the release note are not for _us_, or
> for _credit_ --- they are for our general users. If you would like that
> changed, you need to make a case for that change.
Certainly, that's mostly true. But if it was entirely true, then no
individual would be named on the release notes at all. That would be a
mistake, but not because any ordinary user would care one bit.
I am not going to comment further on this matter.
--
Peter Geoghegan
