On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Agreed. I think we're making a mountain out of a molehill here. As
>> long as the locks that are actually used are monotonic, just use > and
>> stick a comment in there explaining that it could need adjustment if
>> we use other lock levels in the future. I presume all the lock-levels
>> used for DDL are, and will always be, self-exclusive, so why all this
>> hand-wringing?
>>
>
> New version attached with suggested changes.
Thanks!
+# SET autovacuum_* options needs a ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
+# so we mix reads with it to see what works or waits
s/needs/need/ and I think you mean mixing "writes", not "reads".
Those are minor things though, and from my point of view a committer
can look at it.
Regards,
--
Michael