Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

2 March 2012

• 00:31   Re: review of: collation for (expr) Jaime Casanova
• 00:32   Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Tom Lane
• 00:35   Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Shigeru Hanada
• 00:46   Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas
• 01:04   Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian
• 01:11   Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Tom Lane
• 01:13   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Peter Geoghegan
• 01:45   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera
• 02:52   Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas
• 03:31   Canceling ROLLBACK statement Pavan Deolasee
• 04:02   Re: Canceling ROLLBACK statement Tom Lane
• 07:30   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 07:30   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 07:47   Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs
• 08:26   Re: Allowing multi "-t" and adding "-n" to vacuumdb ? Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais
• 09:44   autovacuum locks Gregg Jaskiewicz
• 10:03   Re: autovacuum locks Alvaro Herrera
• 10:12   Re: autovacuum locks Gregg Jaskiewicz
• 10:22   Re: autovacuum locks Gregg Jaskiewicz
• 10:25   Re: Bugs/slowness inserting and indexing cubes Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:34   Re: Website stylesheet for local docs Magnus Hagander
• 11:42   Re: Reducing bgwriter wakeups Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:26   Re: pg_basebackup -x stream from the standby gets stuck Magnus Hagander
• 13:25   Re: autovacuum locks Alvaro Herrera
• 13:46   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera
• 14:05   Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup() Gilles Darold
• 14:08   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 14:28   Re: autovacuum locks Robert Haas
• 14:37   Re: autovacuum locks Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: autovacuum locks Kevin Grittner
• 15:41   Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Noah Misch
• 15:54   Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Peter Geoghegan
• 16:35   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Josh Berkus
• 16:48   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Peter Eisentraut
• 17:54   Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Daniel Farina
• 18:20   Re: review of: collation for (expr) Peter Eisentraut
• 18:36   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Robert Haas
• 18:41   Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Simon Riggs
• 18:45   Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Jeff Janes
• 18:48   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Simon Riggs
• 18:57   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Josh Berkus
• 19:10   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane
• 19:18   Re: index-only quals vs. security_barrier views Noah Misch
• 19:36   Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays Tom Lane
• 19:45   sortsupport for text Robert Haas
• 19:58   Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Noah Misch
• 20:12   Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Kevin Grittner
• 20:51   Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Robert Haas
• 20:57   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Simon Riggs
• 21:08   Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Daniel Farina
• 21:28   Re: possible new option for wal_sync_method Dan Scales
• 21:33   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine
• 21:46   Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Simon Riggs
• 22:16   Re: COPY with hints, rebirth Kevin Grittner
• 22:34   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown
• 23:01   Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Robert Haas
• 23:09   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown
• 23:13   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Robert Haas
• 23:39   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 anarazel@anarazel.de
• 23:56   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown