Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1xTPyqzGGLbq5jaDhb_0gbtTK1U9PBD2DAfLb5-YpOObA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> v8 attached
>
> v10 attached.
>
> This patch covers all the valid concerns discussed and has been
> extensively tested.

If I turn wal_level to anything other than minimal, this fails to pass
make installcheck with multiple instances of

ERROR:  invalid page header in block 0 of relation....

I've looked around in the patch docs and this thread, and this doesn't
seem to be either expected or already known.

This occurs even when page_checksums is off.

Cheers,

Jeff


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)