Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

27 August 2008

• 01:07   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Tom Lane
• 01:40   Re: TODO <-> Commitfest Alvaro Herrera
• 01:47   Re: TODO <-> Commitfest David Fetter
• 02:45   Re: can't stop autovacuum by HUP'ing the server Alvaro Herrera
• 07:14   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Jan Urbański
• 07:46   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:04   Re: Proposal to sync SET ROLE and pg_stat_activity Grant Finnemore
• 12:26   Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch] Simon Riggs
• 12:26   Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Simon Riggs
• 13:06   Re: TODO <-> Commitfest Alvaro Herrera
• 13:41   Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch] Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:07   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: pg_dump roles support Benedek László
• 14:32   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:42   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: TODO <-> Commitfest Brendan Jurd
• 15:06   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:36   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:13   Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? Greg Stark
• 23:38   code coverage patch Michelle Caisse