Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]
Date
Msg-id 1219760301.4126.40.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 11:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> The advantages of doing this would be (a) reduce the number of places
> to look in when implementing a new node type; (b) eliminate some
> cross-subsystem #inclusions that weaken modularity of the backend.

Are we doing either of those things in this release?

Might these changes screw up patches already in progress? Can we hold
off making these changes until we're sure the latter isn't true?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Grant Finnemore
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal to sync SET ROLE and pg_stat_activity
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO <-> Commitfest