Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

20 September 1999

• 00:25   Re: [HACKERS] Notice: heap_open/close changes committed Vadim Mikheev
• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] Why do we need pg_vlock? Vadim Mikheev
• 00:58   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone understand shared buffer refcount mechanism? Vadim Mikheev
• 01:18   Re: [HACKERS] couldn't rollback cache ? Vadim Mikheev
• 01:44   RE: [HACKERS] couldn't rollback cache ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:08   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? Thomas Lockhart
• 02:10   Re: INSERT/DEFAULT VALUES broken? Thomas Lockhart
• 02:35   why do shmem attach? Vadim Mikheev
• 02:48   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? Michael Robinson
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? Bruce Momjian
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Vadim Mikheev
• 04:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 Dmitry Samersoff
• 05:25   RE: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:00   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Vadim Mikheev
• 06:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 Theo Kramer
• 09:02   Re: Referential Integrity In PostgreSQL wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:21   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? Chris Bitmead
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? Bruce Momjian
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Bruce Momjian
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Bruce Momjian
• 12:36   Status on Jan Wieck Bruce Momjian
• 12:45   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Tom Lane
• 12:48   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? José Soares
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Vadim Mikheev
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Tom Lane
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Notice: heap_open/close changes committed Tom Lane
• 13:13   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Bruce Momjian
• 13:13   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Vadim Mikheev
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone understand shared buffer refcount mechanism? Tom Lane
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Bruce Momjian
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Vadim Mikheev
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] couldn't rollback cache ? Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] Notice: heap_open/close changes committed Vadim Mikheev
• 15:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 Brook Milligan
• 15:29   RE: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Peter Mount
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? Leon
• 15:55   Crash (maybe related to temp tables) Daniele Orlandi
• 16:05   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:33   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Vadim Mikheev
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Bruce Momjian
• 17:30   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck Peter Mount
• 18:01   Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0 Bruce Momjian
• 19:07   New TODO detail Bruce Momjian
• 19:29   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 20:19   Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 20:27   Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] join problems ... The Hermit Hacker
• 20:29   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck The Hermit Hacker
• 20:33   Re: [HACKERS] Status on Jan Wieck The Hermit Hacker
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] The Hermit Hacker
• 20:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
• 20:41   Re: [HACKERS] Command Locations (was Re: HISTORY for 6.5....) The Hermit Hacker
• 20:51   create table and default 'now' problem ? Oleg Bartunov
• 21:10   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] Bruce Momjian
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 Vince Vielhaber
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] The Hermit Hacker
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] Bruce Momjian
• 21:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 Yu Cao
• 21:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian
• 21:54   PostgreSQL 6.5.2 RPMS available. Lamar Owen
• 22:04   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] Lamar Owen
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] Bruce Momjian
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 Michael Simms
• 23:19   Re: [PORTS] Linux/Alpha patches for Postgresql 6.5.2 Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 23:45   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused] Lamar Owen