Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
Date
Msg-id 199909201321.JAA18372@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > Or shmem inheritance is not portable?
> > 
> > If it works on your machine with it removed, commit the change and I can
> > test it here.   I don't know of any portability problems with shared
> > memory children.
> 
> I wrote simple test program and it works under FreeBSD and Solaris
> (on Ultra). Currently I'm not able to do more. Actually, I worry
> does this work under MS Windows.

This code was not added for MS Windows, so it is anyone's guess whether
it needs it.  Let's remove it and see.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?