Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
Date
Msg-id 37E5C733.ABE1902D@krs.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses RE: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Or shmem inheritance is not portable?
> 
> If it works on your machine with it removed, commit the change and I can
> test it here.   I don't know of any portability problems with shared
> memory children.

I wrote simple test program and it works under FreeBSD and Solaris
(on Ultra). Currently I'm not able to do more. Actually, I worry
does this work under MS Windows.

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
Next
From: Dmitry Samersoff
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2