RE: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
Date
Msg-id 000001bf0331$4211b200$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org]On Behalf Of Vadim Mikheev
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 2:34 PM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: PostgreSQL Developers List
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Or shmem inheritance is not portable?
> >
> > If it works on your machine with it removed, commit the change and I can
> > test it here.   I don't know of any portability problems with shared
> > memory children.
>
> I wrote simple test program and it works under FreeBSD and Solaris
> (on Ultra). Currently I'm not able to do more. Actually, I worry
> does this work under MS Windows.
>

Where do we attach to shmem after fork() ?
I couldn't find the place.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Samersoff
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Next
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?