Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9909201925341.38923-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Vince Vielhaber wrote:

> 
> On 20-Sep-99 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> >> I have been thinking, the destroy should be drop, in keeping with SQL. 
> >> destroy was a QUEL'ism.
> > 
> > {create,destroy}{user,db} should be drop'd, personally...admins should use
> > the SQL commands directly...
> 
> I think it'd be better if they were kept.  They're really convenient for
> the newbie (I just introduced someone to PostgreSQL and all the way thru
> were references to MySQL, including the create user, db, etc. scripts).

My personal dislike for them is that they are incomplete...CREATE USER and
CREATE DATABASE  have a helluva lot of options available to it...using
createuser, you don't know/learn abotu them...

Force the admin to learn what they are doing...if they want to create
short cut scripts, let *them* do it...

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]