Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adam Brusselback
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id CAMjNa7dwFyVLJWHJOudemz-sTZJ5QLhnNSSDN+9d3BEZHPV4XA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna@comcast.net>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-general
>  How good will that be in performance.

In my experience, not great. It's definitely better than not having it at all, but it does not make for quick queries and caused serious connection overhead when a query referenced that foreign table. I've since moved to logical replication to improve the situation there.

In SQL Server I had never noticed the difference when I had to do cross-db queries. There may or may not be a difference, but it was never something that I had to think about or look up, so I am not sure.

It's something I do still miss though, as it sure was convenient.

Just my $0.02.
-Adam 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Next
From: Guyren Howe
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment