Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ravi Krishna
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id 3636F2F8-3D41-4377-9B61-905D269657FD@comcast.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
>
> Eh, that's something that I think we should be looking at supporting, by
> using FDWs, but I haven't tried to figure out how hard it'd be.
>

How good will that be in performance.

In db2 you can do it using dblinks and that kills performance. isn't FDW  something like dblink.

The cool part is that in SQLServer the optimizer recognizes 3 part name and caching works also.





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment