Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id 4d67e2f9-801a-db09-bf33-1911b6c1f818@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-general
Ron schrieb am 02.06.2020 um 20:38:
>
>>    PG's individual clusters are relatively lightweight, after all.
>
> But require a new port, and Enterprises have Processes that must be followed.

I am not 100% sure, but I think you can get around that by putting pgPool or pgBouncer
in front and make all connections through that (with a single port)






pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Next
From: Adam Brusselback
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment