On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Fabien COELHO <
coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Amit,
>
>>> I think that we may conclude, on these run:
>>>
>>> (1) sorting seems not to harm performance, and may help a lot.
>>
>>
>> I agree with first part, but about helping a lot, I am not sure
>
>
> I'm focussing on the "sort" dimension alone, that is I'm comparing the average tps performance with sorting with the same test without sorting, : There are 4 cases from your tests, if I'm not mistaken:
>
> - T1 flush=off 27480 -> 27482 : +0.0%
> - T1 flush=on 25214 -> 26819 : +6.3%
> - T2 flush=off 5050 -> 6194 : +22.6%
> - T2 flush=on 2771 -> 6110 : +120.4%
>
There is a clear win only in cases when sort is used with flush, apart
from that using sort alone doesn't have any clear advantage.
