Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.10.1509100824360.25031@sto
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: checkpointer continuous flushing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Amit,

>>  - T1 flush=off  27480 -> 27482 :    +0.0%
>>  - T1 flush=on   25214 -> 26819 :    +6.3%
>>  - T2 flush=off   5050 ->  6194 :   +22.6%
>>  - T2 flush=on    2771 ->  6110 :  +120.4%
>
> There is a clear win only in cases when sort is used with flush, apart
> from that using sort alone doesn't have any clear advantage.

Indeed, I agree that the improvement is much smaller without flushing, 
although it is there somehow (+0.0 & +22.6 => +11.3% on average).

Well, at least we may agree that it is "somehow significantly better" ?:-)

-- 
Fabien.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Small typo in timeline.h regarding the meaning of infinity for timeline history entry
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data