On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Fujii Masao <
masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Amit Kapila <
amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You mean to say, just try renaming tablespace_map and don't display any
> > message whether that is successful or not-successful?
> >
> > I see some user inconvenience if we do this way, which is even after the
> > backup is cancelled, on next recovery, there will be a log message
> > indicating
> > either rename of tablespace_map successful or unsuccessful. Also, don't you
> > think it is better to let user know that the tablespace_map file is
> > successfully
> > renamed as we do for backup_label file. Shall we change the patch such that
> > if backup_label is successfully renamed and renaming of tablespace_map
> > gets failed, then display a log message to something like below:
> >
> > LOG: online backup mode canceled
> > DETAIL: "backup_label" was renamed to "backup_label.old", could not rename
> > "tablespace_map" to "tablespace_map.old"
>
> Agreed with this direction. So what about the attached patch?
>
- errdetail("Could not rename \"%s\" to \"%s\": %m.",
+ errdetail("\"%s\" could not be renamed to \"%s\": %m.",
Is there any reason to change this message?
I think you have changed this message to make it somewhat similar with
the new message we are planning to use in this function, but I don't see
that as compelling reason to change this message.
Other than that patch looks good.
